Vol. 1 No. 1 (2023): Volume 1 Number 1 December 2023
Articles

Tata Kelola Pertambangan Melalui Kebijakan Pencabutan Izin yang Berwawasan Lingkungan: Perspektif Hukum Administrasi Negara

  • Wahyu Nugroho
Wahyu Nugroho
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sahid Jakarta

Published 2024-01-10

Keywords

  • Mining Business License,
  • Mining,
  • Administrative Law,
  • Environment
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Tata Kelola Pertambangan Melalui Kebijakan Pencabutan Izin yang Berwawasan Lingkungan: Perspektif Hukum Administrasi Negara. (2024). JIMLY LEGAL YUSTISIA JOURNAL, 1(1), 27-42. https://jslgjournal.com/jly/article/view/3

Abstract

Management of mineral and coal mining resources relies heavily on a governance system that is oriented towards good governance, and environmental and sustainable principles, as mandated by the constitution in Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution—policy for revoking mineral and stone Mining Business Permits (Indonesian: Izin Usaha Pertambangan/IUP). The President's implementation of coal is part of efforts to improve the mining and environmental governance system. The first problem is, what is the authority, mechanism, and criteria for revoking mining business permits from an administrative law perspective? secondly, does the revocation of an IUP have implications for a good mining and environmental governance system? The method used in this research is a normative juridical method, sourced from primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials, with qualitative data analysis techniques. The first conclusion, the mechanism for revoking an IUP starts from a comprehensive evaluation of the IUP from planning to post-implementation of mineral and coal mining activities, based on administrative, technical, environmental, and financial evaluations. The criteria for IUPs that are revoked are IUPs that do not submit Work Plan and Budget reports, IUPs that do not operate, and IUPs that do not carry out post-mining reclamation obligations and do not carry out environmental management. Second, the revocation of an IUP has three implications, namely juridical, sociological, and environmental implications. The juridical implications are policies for regulating and improving the mining governance system in Indonesia as well as the government's consistency in implementing the green constitution. The sociological implication is to obtain community social support capacity and local community access to natural resource management rights. Finally, the implications of environmental insight, as a global commitment to implementing sustainable development principles, are integrated into the licensing system for mining business activities.

References

  1. Anggara, Sahya. Hukum Administrasi Negara, Cet.I. Bandung: Pustaka Setia, 2018.
  2. Black, Henry Campbell Black. Black’s Law Dictionary, United States: West Publishing Company, l990.
  3. Butarbutar, Elisabeth Nurhaini. Metode Penelitian Hukum (Langkah Langkah untuk Menemukan Kebenaran dalam Ilmu Hukum). Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2018.
  4. Hayrani DS, Mayer. “Pengaturan Pengawasan Pusat Terhadap Izin Usaha Pertambangan Mineral dan Batubara di era otonomi daerah”. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, Vol 16, No. 1, 2019.
  5. Isnaeni, Diyan. “Implikasi Yuridis Kewenangan Pemerintah Daerah Dalam Pemberian Ijin Usaha Pertambangan Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014”. Yurispruden, Vol 1, No. 1, 2018.
  6. Miles, Mattew B.– & Huberman, A. Michael Analisis Data Kualitatif, Penerjemah Tjetjep Rohendi Rohidi. Jakarta: Penerbit UI, 1992.
  7. Moleong, Lexy J. Metodologi Penelitian kualitatif, Cet. 22. Bandung: Remaja Rosda Karya, 2006.
  8. Nurmayani. Hukum Administrasi Daerah. Bandar Lampung: Universitas Lampung, 2009.
  9. Ridwan, HR. Hukum Administrasi Negara, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2006.
  10. Setiadi, Wicipto. “Sanksi Administratif Sebagai Salah Satu Instrumen Penegakan Hukum Dalam Peraturan Perundang-Undangan”. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, Vol 6, No. 4, 2009.
  11. Sutedi, Andrian. Hukum Perizinan Dalam Sektor Pelayanan Publik. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2010.
  12. Singarimbun, Masri dan Effendi, Sofyan, Metode Penelitian Survey. Jakarta: LP3S, 1989.
  13. Soekanto, Soerjono dan Mamudji, Sri. Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2003.
  14. Soekanto, Soerjono. Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: UI-Press, 2010.
  15. Sukardi, Imam. “Asas Contrarius Actus sebagai Kontrol Pemerintah terhadap Kebebasan Berserikat dan Berkumpul di Indonesia”. Mimbar Keadilan, Vol 12, No. 2, Agustus 2019 – Januari 2020.
  16. Widodo & Indra Dewi Hananto, Rika. Problematika Kewenangan Pemberian Izin Usaha Pertambangan Setelah Berlakunya Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 Tentang Pemerintahan Daerah, Surabaya, Universitas Negeri Surabaya: Program Studi Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Hukum, 2015.
  17. Winarno, Nur Basuki. Penyalahgunaan Wewenang dan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Yogyakarta: Laksbang Mediatama, 2008.
  18. Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2020 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 4 tahun 2009 tentang Pertambangan Mineral dan Batubara.
  19. Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan.
  20. Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2023 tentang Penetapan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2022 tentang Cipta Kerja menjadi Undang-Undang.
  21. Peraturan Pemerintah Indonesia Nomor 96 Tahun 2021 tentang Pelaksanaan Kegiatan Usaha Pertambangan Mineral dan Batubara.