Tanggung Gugat Pelaku Usaha Online terhadap Konsumen yang Dirugikan atas Tidak Terteranya Informasi Non-Halal pada Aplikasi Gfood
Published 2024-01-10
Keywords
- Corporate Liability,
- Online Food Service,
- Non-Halal Labels on Applications

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Abstract
This research is based on the weak condition of consumers compared to business actors, which means that many processed foods containing pork are bought and sold online, without providing haram information or labels. The issues raised include whether PT. Grab Teknologi Indonesia is responsible for food applications that do not state halal or non-halal information on food consumed by FAs through Gfood application orders" in terms of Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection. The research was conducted using a normative approach. Conclusions obtained by PT. GTI and business actors, in this case the K99 Restaurant, are limited to providing applications and delivery services. K99 Restaurant produces and trades processed pork food, does not provide correct, clear, honest information, and does not follow the provisions for including halal labels as stated in Article 7 letter b and Article 8 paragraph (1) letter h of Law no. 8 of 1999. K99 restaurants that do not include haram labels on the food products they produce and trade result in FA suffering material and immaterial losses. In this case PT. GTI has transferred its responsibility to K99 Restaurant as a business actor based on clause 5.2 point 5 of the Applicable Terms and Conditions. The K99 Restaurant is responsible for providing compensation to the FA, however considering that there is a time limit for providing compensation which is only 7 (seven) days from the date of the transaction, the K99 Restaurant can be sued on the basis of an unlawful act as stipulated in Article 1365 of the Civil Code.
References
- Abdulkadir Muhammad, Etika Profesi Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2001.
- Abdulhay, Marhaenis. Hukum Perdata. Jakarta: Pembinaan UPN, 2006.
- A.Z. Nasution, Tinjauan Sosial Ekonomi Dan Hukum Pada Perlindungan Konsumen Indonesia. Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan, 1995.
- Fuady, Munir, Hukum Kontrak (Dari Sudut Pandang Hukum Bisnis) Buku Kedua. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, 2003.
- Fuady, Munir. Perbuatan Melawan Hukum: Pendekaran Kontemporer. (Jakarta: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, 2005.
- Indozone, “Akhirnya Grab Minta Maaf Pelanggan Tertipu Makan Babi, Pesan Makanan Tanpa Label Non Halal” Indozone.com. https://news.indozone.id/news/911551117/akhirnya-grab-minta-maaf-pelanggan-tertipu-makan-babi-pesan-makanan-tanpa-label-non-halal (accessed September 8, 2023).
- Kenneth J. Laudon, Jane P. Laudon, Sistem Informasi Manajemen: The Digital Firm, International Edotion. New Jersey: Pentise Hall International Inc., 1998.
- Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata.
- Koronas, R., Jaminan Produk Halal Di Indonesia, Perspektif Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen. Depok: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2017.
- Marzuki, P. M., Penelitian Hukum (edisi Revisi). Jakarta: Kencana Prenadamedia Group, 2014.
- Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen.
- Undang-Undang Nomor 33 Tahun 2014 tentang Jaminan Produk Halal.
- Sidharta, Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen Indonesia. Jakarta: Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia, 2004.
- Soekanto, S. & Sri, M., Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: Radjawali, 1985.
- Subekti, R, dan R. Tjitrosudibio, Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Perdata (KUH Perdata). Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita, 2003.
- Rosmawati, Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen. Jakarta: Kencana, 2018.
- Zulham, Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group, 2016.