Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Volume 1 Number 2 June 2024
Articles

Advokat Sebagai Subyek Tersangka dalam Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang

PDF
  • Miftakhul Multazam Azam,
  • Leo Setya Hardinanta Leo
Miftakhul Multazam Azam
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Hang Tuah
Leo Setya Hardinanta Leo
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Hang Tuah

Published 2025-05-09

Keywords

  • Money Laundering,
  • Advocates,
  • Regulatory Conflicts,
  • Crime

Copyright (c) 2025 Jimly Legal Yustisia Journal

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Advokat Sebagai Subyek Tersangka dalam Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang. (2025). JIMLY LEGAL YUSTISIA JOURNAL, 1(2), 28-40. https://jslgjournal.com/jly/article/view/8

Abstract

Regulations regarding advocates as one of the suspect subjects in money laundering crimes are regulated in Government Regulation Number 61 of 2021 on Amendments of Government Regulation Number 43 of 2015 on Reporting Parties in the Prevention and Eradication of Money Laundering Crimes (Government Regulation No.61/2021), but on the other hand in Law Number 18 of 2003 on Advocates (Law No.18/2003), Advocates are obliged to maintain client confidentiality relating to the legal position of service users (clients). The lack of harmonization between the substance of Government Regulation No.61/2021 and the Advocates Law has drawn criticism from some advocates because it is considered to conflict with the regulation of immunity rights in the profession of advocates. So, the problem is whether advocates can be used as suspect subjects according to Government Regulation 61/2021. This research uses a normative juridical research method based on library legal materials consisting of primary and secondary legal material. The results obtained from this research are that the principle of lex superior derogate legi inferiori in Article 8 paragraph (1) of Government Regulation No.61/2021 is contrary to Article 19 paragraph (1) of Law No.18/2003, so that advocates cannot be made suspect subjects according to Government Regulation No.61/2021. The rules regarding Advocates as suspects should be regulated in Law Number 8 of 2010 on Money Laundry Crime.

PDF

References

  1. Anton, Yudi “Peran Advokat Dalam Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Masa Depan Dan Kontroversial,” Jurnal Ius Facti 2 (June 2023): 249–50.
  2. Aritonang, Syofina Dwi Putri, “Harmonization of State Receivables Management Arrangements: Perspective of Authority Theory and Hierarchy Theory of Legislative Regulations,” Reformasi Hukum 28, no. 1 (April 29, 2024): 80–89.
  3. Banjarnahor, Roy Ganda Marbun, “Analisis Yuridis Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Saksi Dan Pelapor Dalam Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Di Indonesia,” Jurnal Rectum 3 (July 2021): 373–84.
  4. Berutu, Ali Geno, “Tindak Pidana Kejahatan Pencucian Uang (Money Laundering) Dalam Pandangan KUHP Dan Hukum Pidana Islam,” Journal of Sharia Economic Law 2 (March 2019): 1–18.
  5. Cahyani, Fenny et al., “Kedudukan Hak Imunitas Advokat Di Indonesia,” Jurnal Usm Law Review 4, no. 1 (June 18, 2021): 146.
  6. Dowel, John Mc dan Gary Novit, The Consequences of Money Laundering Financial 17 Crime, May 2001.
  7. Fardila, Priska Mei Nur and Hanin Alya’ Labibah, “Penerapan Asas Lex Specialis Derogat Legi Generali Terhadap Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 Tentang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik Berkaitan Dengan Kejahatan Judi Online,” Jurnal Justitiable 7 (July 2024): 1–15.
  8. Handayani, Fitria Andalus dan Mohamad Ichsana Nur, “Implementasi Good Governance di Indonesia,” Publica: Jurnal Pemikiran Administrasi Negara 11, no. 1 (June 10, 2019): 1–11,
  9. Laksono, Alam Suryo, “Eksistensi Advokat Sebagai Penegak Hukum Dalam Proses Peradilan Pidana Ditinjau Dari Pasal 56 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana,” UNES Journal of Swara Justisia 5, no. 1 (April 30, 2021).
  10. Marzuki Peter Mahmud, Penelitian Hukum, Edisi Revisi, Prenadamedia Group, Jakarta, 2016, hlm. 133.
  11. Marzuki, Peter Mahmud, 2013. Penelitian Hukum. Edisi Revisi. Jakarta. Penerbit Kencana Prenada Media Grup. Hal. 139
  12. Mustika, Cindyva Thalia, et.al, “Penerapan Asas Lex Superior Derogat Legi Inferior Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Informasi Publik,” Banua Law Riview 3, no. 1 (April 2021): 87–97.
  13. Nilamsari, Martina dan I Made Wirya Darma, “Legalitas Kedudukan advokat Sebagai Pihak Pelapor Dalam Pencegahan Dan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang,” Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan Masyarakat 15 (January 2024): 75–85.
  14. Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 61 Tahun 2021 Tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 43 Tahun 2015 Tentang Pihak Pelapor Dalam Pencegahan Dan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang.
  15. Pratiwi Leny, “Harmonisasi Dan Sinkronisasi Hukum Terhadap Perbedaan Pengaturan Barang Impor Dalam Keadaan Baru,” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum 25, no. 1 (January 2018): 69–91.
  16. Syarifudin, “Tata Cara Penanganan Aset Hasil Tindak Pidana Berdasarkan Perma Nomor 1 Tahun 2013 tentang Tata Cara Penyelesaian Permohonan Penanganan Harta Kekayaan Dalam Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang atau Tindak Pidana Lain”, PT. Imaji Karya, Jakarta, 2020, hlm. 23
  17. Soekanto dan Sri Mamudji, Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat, 13–14; Lihat juga Wignjosoebroto, Hukum, Paradigma, Metode dan Dinamika Masalahnya, 148.
  18. Undang-Undang Nomor 18 Tahun 2003 tentang Advokat
  19. Zamroni M, “Himpunan Tori Hukum & Konsep Hukum untuk Penelitian Hukum”, Scopindo Media Pustaka, Surabaya, hlm. 14-15.